With the added advantage that they can employ people who do not own a car thus freeing up the visitors/patients parking spaces & increasing the revenue generated.
With the added advantage that they can employ people who do not own a car thus freeing up the visitors/patients parking spaces & increasing the revenue generated.
As it stands at many hospitals the staff are given consessions to park free of charge.
Oh.. & it'll look on the face of it as if they are running a 'greener & more health conscious' hospital which will show up statistically as a reduction in overall carbon footprinting.
All depends how we choose to view changes.
With the added advantage that they can employ people who do not own a car thus freeing up the visitors/patients parking spaces & increasing the revenue generated.
As it stands at many hospitals the staff are given consessions to park free of charge.
Oh.. & it'll look on the face of it as if they are running a 'greener & more health conscious' hospital which will show up statistically as a reduction in overall carbon footprinting.
All depends how we choose to view changes.
I take it you read more from Bernies post than I.Considering the job entails covering 3000 sq miles and the employer not the employee would have to incur travel expensies i do not think your idea would be cost effective
In North Wales they going to charge staff for using the car park about £100 pa
They charge the poor patients already as a result car park mostly empty, how do some patients get to hosp? They get relatives to drive them then pick them up again resulting in double journey more conjestion more co2. This in an area with hardy any public transport
But they have built a supid cycle way which is empty expecting ill and injured people to cycle miles to get treatment
But Roger, you aren't being cynical enough: the millions of pounds extra being pumped into the health service comes from your parking charges...
Jonathan Paton